City of Little Falls v. Reardon
This text of 264 A.D. 826 (City of Little Falls v. Reardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to strike out the answer and for summary judgment granted, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of [827]*827Mongaup Valley Company, Inc., v. Orange Bod & Cun Club, Inc. (253 App. Div. 465; affd., 280 N. Y. 582). All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer of defendant bank and for entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 826, 35 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-little-falls-v-reardon-nyappdiv-1942.