City of Leon Valley Economic Development Corp. v. Larry Little
Opinion
ACCEPTED
04-15-00488-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
04-15-00488-CV 8/4/2015 8:27:38 PM KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
CAUSE NO. 2011-CI-17823
FILED IN
LARRY LITTLE § 4th COURT IN THE DISTRICT COURTOF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
§
vs. § 37TH JUDICIAL8/4/2015 DISTRICT8:27:38 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE
§ Clerk CITY OF LEON VALLEY § ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT § CORPORATION § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DEFENDANT, CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
Defendant, City of Leon Valley Economic Development Corporation, gives notice
of its desire to appeal the trial court's Final Judgment, signed on May 13, 2015. This
judgment was signed by the Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge of the 57th District Court,
sitting in Bexar County, Texas. The Final Judgment is attached to this Notice of Appeal.
This appeal is taken to the Fourth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas, sitting in San
Antonio, Texas. This is not an accelerated appeal.
Respectfully submitted, Law Office of Dan Pozza 239 E. Commerce St. San Antonio, TX 78205 (210) 226-8888 – Phone (210) 224-6373 – Fax danpozza@yahoo.com
By: /s/Dan Pozza
DAN POZZA State Bar No. 16224800
and
R. Gaines Griffin State Bar No. 08464500 Davidson, Troilo, Ream & Garza 7550 IH-10 West, #800 San Antonio, TX 78229 (210) 349-6484 – Phone (210) 349-0041 – Fax ggriffin@dtrglaw.com
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Appeal has been delivered via e-mail transmission on this 5th day of August, 2015 to:
Matthew F. Wymer Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, LLP 112 East Pecan Street, #2750 San Antonio, TX 78205 mwymer@bmpllp.com
ATTORNEY FOR LARRY LITTLE
/s/Dan Pozza DAN POZZA
CAUSE NO. 2011-CI-17823
LARRY LITTLE, § IN TIIE DJSTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § §
vs. § 37.,.11 JUDICIAL DISTRICT §
CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC § DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, § Defendant. § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
FINAL JlJDGM.ENT
CAME ON April 6, 20 I 5, this case was called for trial. Plaintiff LARRY LITTLE
("Plaintiff'), appeared in person and through his attorney and announced ready for trial.
Defendant CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
("Defendant"), appeared through its representative and through its attomey and announced
ready for trial.
After a jury was impaneled and swom, it heard the evidence and arguments of counsel.
On April 10, 20 I S, in response to the jury charge, the jury made findings that the Court received,
filed, and entered of record. The questions submitted to the jury and the jury's unanimous
findings am ntlnched as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
The Court hereby RENDERS judgment for Plaintiff:
IT TS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff shall h ave
judgment aga inst Dt:fendant, and therefore the Court orders that Plaintiff recovt:r damages from
Defendant in the sum of $2,220,454.00, plus prejudgment interest ·e.u...Jhol--s!Jlll, nt lhe annual Miz_.:.
rate~
of 5%, in the sum of $249,043.74 for a total of $2,469,497 .74 , postjudgmcnt interest on the total
sum at the annual rate of 5%, and com1 costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, Plaintiff requested attorney
fees based on Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 38. The Court examined the file,
took judicial notice of the usual and customary attorney fees, and determined reasonable and
Larry Little v. LVEDC Final Judgment Plige I of2 necessary atlom ey fees, as was stipulated by the parties, to be $ 17 1, 754.50. T he Court Orders
Defendan! to pay Plainti ff $ 171.754.40 for attorney fees.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that in the event of an
appeal by the Defendants in which the Plaintiff prevails, the reasonab le attorney fees arc;
1. For representation through appeal to the court of appeals to be $20,000.
2. For representation tlu·ough the comple tion of appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas to be $20,000.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADnJDGED and DECREED, that P laintiff is allowed
such writs and processes as may be n ecessary in the enforcement and collection of this
Jud&1111ent. The Court orders execution to issue for this Judgment.
All other relie f not expressly gran~ this Judgment is hereby DENIED.
Sl GNED and ENTERED this~ day of May 2015. _..--.......__
JUDGE,ANTON
Agreed to form: 0 N ~ CITY OF LEON VAL LEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
L_~fl-v- . _ Counsel for Defendant, C ITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Agreed to Substance and Fann;
W\;{)JJUl fmf AAC/1y_ ,..-
counse1 for Plaintiff; LA~E
Larry Lillie v. LVEDC Final Judgment Page 2 of2 2 160888v.I 0051011106034
CHARGE OF THE COURT
MEMBERS OF THE JURY: '-\ \
After the closing arguments, you will go to the jury room to decide the cast;, answer~ the questions that are attached, and reach a verdict. You may discuss the case with other jurors only when you are all together ln the jury room.
Remember my previous instructions: Do not discuss the case with anyone else, either in person or by any other means. Do not do any independent investigation about the case or conduct any research. Do not look up any words in di ctionaries or on the Internet. Do not post infonnation about the case on the Internet. Do not share any special knowledge or experiences with the other jurors. Do not use your phone or any other electronic device during your deliberations for any reason . I will give you a number where others may contact you in case of an emergency.
Any notes you have taken are for your own personal use. You may take your notes back into the jury room and consult them during deliberations, but do not show or read your notes to your fellow jurors during your deliberations.· Your notes are not evidence. Each of you should rely on your independent recollection of the evjdence and not be influenced by the fact that another juror has or has not taken notes.
You must leave your notes with the bailiff when you are not deliberating. The bailiff will give your notes to me promptly after collecting them from you. I will make sure your notes are kept in a safe, secure location and not disclosed to anyone. After you complete your deliberations, the bailiff will collect your notes. When you are released from jury duty, the bailiff will promptly destroy your notes so that nobody can read what you wrote.
Here are the instructions for answering the questions.
1. Do not let bias, prejudice, or sympathy play any part in your decision.
2. Base your answers only on the evidence admitted in court and on the Jaw that is in
Lany Little v. LVEDC Jury Charge EXHIBIT A
DOCUMENT SCANNED AS FI LED
these instructions and questions. Do not consider or discuss any evidence that was not admitted in the courtroom.
3. You are to make up your own minds about the facts. You are the sole judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to give their testimony. But on matters of law, you must follow all of my instructions.
4. If my instructions use a word in a way that is different from its ordinary meaning, use the meaning I give you, which will be a proper legal definition.
5. All the questions and answers are important. No one should say that any ·question or answer is not important.
6. All of your answers must be based on a preponderance of the evidence. The term "preponderance of the evidence" means the greater weight of credible evidence presented in this case. If you do not find that a preponderance of the evidence supports a "yes" answer, then answer "no." A preponderance of the evidence is not measured by the number of witnesses or by the number of documents admitted in evidence. For a fact to be proved by a preponderance of the evidence, you must find that the fact is more likely true than not true.
7. Do not decide who you think should win before you answer the questions and then just answer the questions to match your decision. Answer each question carefully without considering who will win. Do not discuss or consider the effect your answers will have.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Leon Valley Economic Development Corp. v. Larry Little (City of Leon Valley Economic Development Corp. v. Larry Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.