City of Laredo v. Ulysses D. Ortegon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 2025·No. 04-24-00520-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00520-CV

CITY OF LAREDO,

Appellant

v.

Ulysses D. ORTEGON,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023-CVA-000133-D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2025 ORDER SET ASIDE AND REMANDED Appellant City of Laredo appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying its plea to the jurisdiction. The City has now filed a Notice to Court of Settlement and Request for Remand of Case to Trial Court. According to the City, the parties have reached a settlement, and it no longer wishes to pursue this interlocutory appeal. The City requests that we “close this appeal” and remand this cause to the trial court “for the [p]arties to finalize the settlement at the trial court level.” In the certificate of conference, the City certifies that appellee Ulysses D. Ortegon is unopposed to the relief requested. Ortegon did not file a response.

04-24-00520-CV

The City’s motion is granted. We set aside the trial court’s order denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction without regard to the merits and remand this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(2)(B).

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Laredo v. Ulysses D. Ortegon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

City of Laredo v. Ulysses D. Ortegon (City of Laredo v. Ulysses D. Ortegon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.