City of Laredo v. Guerrero

Texas Supreme Court

City of Laredo v. Guerrero

649 S.W.2d 296, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 335, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 297

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedApril 13, 1983

DocketNo. C-1911

StatusPublished

This text of 649 S.W.2d 296 (City of Laredo v. Guerrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Laredo v. Guerrero, 649 S.W.2d 296, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 335, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 297 (Tex. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gustavo Guerrero was indefinitely suspended from the police force by the Chief of Police of the City of Laredo. The Civil Service Commission upheld the suspension. The district court ordered reinstatement with back pay and the court of appeals affirmed, holding that the written statement of suspension was insufficient under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1269m § 16, because it did not state the rule which was violated was a civil service rule. 646 S.W.2d 581. The statement alleged that Guerrero “violated Rule II, Section 2, letter ‘g’, Intoxication off duty;” and “letter V, conduct unbecoming an officer.” The statement also specified the alleged acts which were in violation of the rules.

The court of appeals’ opinion conflicts with Firemen's & Policemen’s Civil Service Commission of Laredo v. Martinez, 645 S.W.2d 431 (Tex.1983). Pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 483, we therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals without hearing oral argument and render judgment upholding the Commission’s order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gustavo Guerrero was indefinitely suspended from the police force by the Chief of Police of the City of Laredo. The Civil Service Commission upheld the suspension. The district court ordered reinstatement with back pay and the court of appeals affirmed, holding that the written statement of suspension was insufficient under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1269m § 16, because it did not state the rule which was violated was a civil service rule. 646 S.W.2d 581. The statement alleged that Guerrero “violated Rule II, Section 2, letter ‘g’, Intoxication off duty;” and “letter V, conduct unbecoming an officer.” The statement also specified the alleged acts which were in violation of the rules.

The court of appeals’ opinion conflicts with Firemen's & Policemen’s Civil Service Commission of Laredo v. Martinez, 645 S.W.2d 431 (Tex.1983). Pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 483, we therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals without hearing oral argument and render judgment upholding the Commission’s order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 S.W.2d 296, 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 335, 1983 Tex. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-laredo-v-guerrero-tex-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack