City of Lake Charles v. Sharp

680 So. 2d 116, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 1017
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 28, 1996·No. No. K95-1017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THIBODEAUX, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of State of Louisiana v. James A Sonnier (La.App. 3 Cir.1996); 679 So.2d 1011, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, the defendant’s-relator’s writ is denied, and this case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.

WRIT DENIED. REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Lake Charles v. Sharp, 680 So. 2d 116, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 1017 (La. Ct. App. 1996).

680 So. 2d 116 (City of Lake Charles v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sonnier
679 So. 2d 1011 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)