City of Lafayette v. Bush

19 Ind. 326
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 19 Ind. 326 (City of Lafayette v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Lafayette v. Bush, 19 Ind. 326 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was au action by Bush and Wife against The City of Lafayette, and those acting under her, to enjoin the city from using and appropriating certain lots of Mrs. Bush, to the purpose of a street, no compensation having been assessed or tendered. An injunction was granted, to operate until the final hearing, and from the interlocutory order thus granting an injunction, this appeal is taken.

It is now well settled, that a city can not be enjoined from changing the grade of a street, or making any alteration [327]*327therein, which causes consequential damages only to the adjoining proprietor, his property not being appropriated, although such damages have not been assessed and tendered. Such consequential injury is not within the act for the' incorporation of cities, which provides for assessing damages in certain cases; nor is it within the constitutional provision, that private property shall not be taken for public uses, without compensation first assessed and tendered. Macy v. The City of Indianapolis, and authorities there cited, 17 Ind. 267.

B. C. and J. Gregory, for the appellants. Huff and Jones, for the appellees.

Such, however, is not the case before us. Here the city •is appropriating parts of the lots of Mrs. Bush, to the purposes of a street, and digging and excavating them for that purpose. Provision is made for assessing and tendering damages in such cases, and the city can not thus appropriate the property of the plaintiff, without first complying with such provision. 1 G-. & H. Stat., p. 231, sec. 59*, et seq.

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbell v. City of Des Moines
173 Iowa 55 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
School Town of Andrews v. Heiney
98 N.E. 628 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)
City of Valparaiso v. Hagen
48 L.R.A. 707 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Parke v. City of Seattle
31 P. 310 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
City Council of Montgomery v. Townsend
84 Ala. 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
City of Kokomo v. Mahan
100 Ind. 242 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
City of Evansville v. Decker
84 Ind. 325 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Cummins v. City of Seymour
79 Ind. 491 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Weis v. City of Madison
75 Ind. 241 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Pierpoint v. Town of Harrisville
9 W. Va. 215 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1876)
City of Pontiac v. Carter
32 Mich. 164 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)
City of Lafayette v. Shultz
44 Ind. 97 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
City of Delphi v. Evans
36 Ind. 90 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
English v. Smock
34 Ind. 115 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)
City of Vincennes v. Richards
23 Ind. 381 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-lafayette-v-bush-ind-1862.