City of Klamath Falls v. Rutherford
476 P.2d 929, 4 Or. App. 49
This text of 476 P.2d 929 (City of Klamath Falls v. Rutherford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Klamath Falls v. Rutherford, 476 P.2d 929, 4 Or. App. 49 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).
Opinion
MEMORANDUM DECISION
This appeal involves violation of a city ordinance. Oral argument confirmed the fact that no constitutional issue was involved. Therefore, in view of ORS 221.350 and 221.360, upon conclusion of argument, we ruled from the bench that this ease be:
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 221.350
Oregon § 221.350
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
476 P.2d 929, 4 Or. App. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-klamath-falls-v-rutherford-orctapp-1970.