City of Kissimmee v. Weimer
This text of 969 So. 2d 1226 (City of Kissimmee v. Weimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF KISSIMMEE and Preferred Governmental Claims Solutions, Petitioners,
v.
Mark WEIMER, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Barbara A. Eagan and Michael Broussard of Broussard, Cullen, DeGailer & Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners.
Mark Weimer, pro se, Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We find that the motion for disqualification of the Judge of Compensation Claims was improvidently granted as it was both untimely and did not state facts which would cause a reasonably prudent person to fear that he or she would not get a fair or impartial hearing. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the cause is remanded to the Judge of Compensation Claims with directions to withdraw the order of recusal and proceed to a disposition on the merits of the petition for benefits.
PETITION GRANTED.
BROWNING, C.J., KAHN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 So. 2d 1226, 2007 WL 4372855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-kissimmee-v-weimer-fladistctapp-2007.