City of Kissimmee v. Simpson

964 So. 2d 765, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13894, 2007 WL 2456193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 2007
DocketNo. 1D06-4296
StatusPublished

This text of 964 So. 2d 765 (City of Kissimmee v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Kissimmee v. Simpson, 964 So. 2d 765, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13894, 2007 WL 2456193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See City of Mary Esther v. McArtor, 902 So.2d 942, 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (where the claimant, a firefighter, suffered coronary artery disease and was actually incapacitated from performing his regular duties, the court reversed the JCC’s finding that the claimant was not entitled to benefits, holding that “the city’s continued payment of the claimant’s salary during his incapacity did not preclude a finding that the claimant was disabled”).

DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Mary Esther v. McArtor
902 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
964 So. 2d 765, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13894, 2007 WL 2456193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-kissimmee-v-simpson-fladistctapp-2007.