City of Kansas City v. Woodson

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Kansas City v. Woodson

247 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, 2008 WL 564453

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 2008

DocketWD 67699

StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.3d 62 (City of Kansas City v. Woodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Kansas City v. Woodson, 247 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, 2008 WL 564453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Woodson brings a pro se appeal of his convictions after a jury trial of violations of Kansas City Ordinance No. 97136, §§ 48-30 and 48-32. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explain-

*63-65 ing our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Woodson brings a pro se appeal of his convictions after a jury trial of violations of Kansas City Ordinance No. 97136, §§ 48-30 and 48-32. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explain-

*63-65 ing our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 62, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, 2008 WL 564453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-kansas-city-v-woodson-moctapp-2008.