City of Kansas City v. Jalaladeen

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Kansas City v. Jalaladeen

847 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 1993 WL 50718

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1993·No. No. WD 46377·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jalaladeen was convicted of a city ordinance violation. He filed an application for a trial de novo, but then failed to appear when the matter was set for trial. His application for trial de novo was dismissed and the case was remanded for execution of sentence. His motion to set aside the remand and to reinstate the appeal was denied and this appeal followed.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jalaladeen was convicted of a city ordinance violation. He filed an application for a trial de novo, but then failed to appear when the matter was set for trial. His application for trial de novo was dismissed and the case was remanded for execution of sentence. His motion to set aside the remand and to reinstate the appeal was denied and this appeal followed.

Judgment is affirmed.

City of Kansas City v. Jalaladeen, 847 S.W.2d 202, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 1993 WL 50718 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

847 S.W.2d 202 (City of Kansas City v. Jalaladeen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.