City of Kansas City v. Crook

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Kansas City v. Crook

469 S.W.3d 871, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 897, 2015 WL 5231042

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. WD 77759·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri (“City”) on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tail-man for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded a judgment of $272.24 to the City of Kansas City, Missouri (“City”) on its claim against Edna Crook and Mary Tail-man for unpaid water service bills. The City appeals, contending the circuit court erred in failing to award damages covering the full three-year period of the alleged delinquency. The City also contends the court erred in allowing hearsay testimony and documents proffered by Crook and Tallman. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

City of Kansas City v. Crook, 469 S.W.3d 871, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 897, 2015 WL 5231042 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

469 S.W.3d 871 (City of Kansas City v. Crook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.