City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 2020·No. 186 WAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

CITY OF JOHNSTOWN, : No. 186 WAL 2020 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : :

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (SEVANICK), :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues.

Whether, in contradiction to its own past opinions, the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law when it held that a claimant seeking benefits for an occupational disease under Section 108 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act has to satisfy the manifestation rule found at Section 301(c)(2)?

Additionally, Respondent’s Application for Leave to File a Response to Petitioner’s

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick), (Pa. 2020).

City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick) (City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.