City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick)
This text of City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick) (City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN, : No. 186 WAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (SEVANICK), : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues.
Whether, in contradiction to its own past opinions, the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law when it held that a claimant seeking benefits for an occupational disease under Section 108 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act has to satisfy the manifestation rule found at Section 301(c)(2)?
Additionally, Respondent’s Application for Leave to File a Response to Petitioner’s
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Johnstown, Pet v. WCAB (Sevanick), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-johnstown-pet-v-wcab-sevanick-pa-2020.