City of Jersey City v. Martin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

City of Jersey City v. Martin

4 A.2d 699, 122 N.J.L. 269, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 213

DecidedMarch 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.2d 699 (City of Jersey City v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Jersey City v. Martin, 4 A.2d 699, 122 N.J.L. 269, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These cases are on three writs of certiorari which bring up certificates of apportionment made by the State Tax Commissioner under chapters 7 and 8, Pamph. L. 1938, and present for review the constitutionality of those statutes and the *270 legality of the apportionments of gross receipts of the Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, the Public Service Electric and Gas Company and the New Jersey Bell Telephone Company. The apportionments made by the Tax Commissioner are affirmed and the writs are dismissed for the reasons given in our determination of The City of Camden v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. L. 253, and of The Mayor, &c., of Hoboken v. Martin, State Tax Commissioner, et al., 122 Id. 264, filed simultaneously herewith; without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These cases are on three writs of certiorari which bring up certificates of apportionment made by the State Tax Commissioner under chapters 7 and 8, Pamph. L. 1938, and present for review the constitutionality of those statutes and the *270 legality of the apportionments of gross receipts of the Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, the Public Service Electric and Gas Company and the New Jersey Bell Telephone Company. The apportionments made by the Tax Commissioner are affirmed and the writs are dismissed for the reasons given in our determination of The City of Camden v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. L. 253, and of The Mayor, &c., of Hoboken v. Martin, State Tax Commissioner, et al., 122 Id. 264, filed simultaneously herewith; without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.2d 699, 122 N.J.L. 269, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-jersey-city-v-martin-nj-1939.