City of Jersey City v. Martin
Opinion
These cases are on three writs of certiorari which bring up certificates of apportionment made by the State Tax Commissioner under chapters 7 and 8, Pamph. L. 1938, and present for review the constitutionality of those statutes and the *270 legality of the apportionments of gross receipts of the Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, the Public Service Electric and Gas Company and the New Jersey Bell Telephone Company. The apportionments made by the Tax Commissioner are affirmed and the writs are dismissed for the reasons given in our determination of The City of Camden v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. L. 253, and of The Mayor, &c., of Hoboken v. Martin, State Tax Commissioner, et al., 122 Id. 264, filed simultaneously herewith; without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 A.2d 699 (City of Jersey City v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.