City of Jacksonville v. Mack

260 So. 2d 542, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6989
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1972·No. No. P-363·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant City of Jacksonville appeals from a final judgment in favor of appellees. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that appellees were joint tortfeasors with another and that the prior release of the other also released and discharged appellees.

The findings of fact made by a court sitting as a trier of the facts are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury and such findings will not be disturbed unless there is a total lack of substantial testimony and evidence to support the conclusion reached. This Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. These principles have been reaffirmed so many times by the appellate courts of this State that no purpose would be served by reiterating the many citations which do so.

Our examination of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments of the parties leads us to conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the judgment appealed herein, and the same is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Jacksonville v. Mack, 260 So. 2d 542, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

260 So. 2d 542 (City of Jacksonville v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin
614 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Banco Do Brasil v. City Nat. Bank
609 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
349 So. 2d 1187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Apeco Marina, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
301 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)