City of Jacksonville v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Jacksonville v. Holmes

130 So. 279, 100 Fla. 812

DecidedOctober 4, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 279 (City of Jacksonville v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Jacksonville v. Holmes, 130 So. 279, 100 Fla. 812 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen, and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises; it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the plaintiff in the court below will enter a remittitur of $500.00 within fifteen days from the filing of the mandate in the court below, as of the date of the judgment, the remainder of the judgment, to-wit, in the sum of $750.00 will be allowed to stand as of the date thereof. Otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitpield, Ellis, Brown and Bupord, J. J., concur. Strum, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen, and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises; it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the plaintiff in the court below will enter a remittitur of $500.00 within fifteen days from the filing of the mandate in the court below, as of the date of the judgment, the remainder of the judgment, to-wit, in the sum of $750.00 will be allowed to stand as of the date thereof. Otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitpield, Ellis, Brown and Bupord, J. J., concur. Strum, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 279, 100 Fla. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-jacksonville-v-holmes-fla-1930.