City of Jackson v. McNally
This text of 275 S.W.3d 375 (City of Jackson v. McNally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Shawn M. McNally and Lynn M. McNally (collectively referred to as “the McNallys”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of the City of Jackson’s (“the City”) motion for a new trial following a jury verdict on damages to the McNallys’ property from the City’s condemnation of a portion of their property.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 S.W.3d 375, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 44, 2009 WL 215366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-jackson-v-mcnally-moctapp-2009.