City of Indianapolis v. Domhoff & Joyce Co.
42 N.E.2d 445, 140 Ohio St. 64, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 64, 23 Ohio Op. 571, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 405
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of this court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case, one of the judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals..
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Indianapolis v. Domhoff & Joyce Co., 42 N.E.2d 445, 140 Ohio St. 64, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 64, 23 Ohio Op. 571, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 405 (Ohio 1942).
42 N.E.2d 445 (City of Indianapolis v. Domhoff & Joyce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hearst Corp. v. Lauerer, Markin & Gibbs, Inc.
524 N.E.2d 193 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1987)
Klever v. City of Stow
13 Ohio App. 3d 17 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)
Klever v. Stow
468 N.E.2d 58 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)
Morris Skilken & Co. v. Watkins Furniture Co.
176 N.E.2d 256 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1961)