City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park

Michigan Supreme Court

City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park

873 N.W.2d 779, 499 Mich. 860

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

DocketNo. 152035

StatusPublished

This text of 873 N.W.2d 779 (City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park, 873 N.W.2d 779, 499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether, in the absence of an agreement for joint funding of a district court in districts of the third class where the court sits in only one political subdivision, all district funding units within the district have an independent obligation to fund the court; (2) whether the parties in this case agreed that the 45th District Court would be funded entirely by the City of Oak Park; and (3) whether revenue from fees collected for building operations and retiree benefits is subject to revenue sharing under MCL 600.8379(l)(c). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether, in the absence of an agreement for joint funding of a district court in districts of the third class where the court sits in only one political subdivision, all district funding units within the district have an independent obligation to fund the court; (2) whether the parties in this case agreed that the 45th District Court would be funded entirely by the City of Oak Park; and (3) whether revenue from fees collected for building operations and retiree benefits is subject to revenue sharing under MCL 600.8379(l)(c). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 N.W.2d 779, 499 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-huntington-woods-v-city-of-oak-park-mich-2016.