City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park

873 N.W.2d 779, 499 Mich. 860
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 2016·No. No. 152035·Published

Opinion

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether, in the absence of an agreement for joint funding of a district court in districts of the third class where the court sits in only one political subdivision, all district funding units within the district have an independent obligation to fund the court; (2) whether the parties in this case agreed that the 45th District Court would be funded entirely by the City of Oak Park; and (3) whether revenue from fees collected for building operations and retiree benefits is subject to revenue sharing under MCL 600.8379(l)(c). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park, 873 N.W.2d 779, 499 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2016).

873 N.W.2d 779 (City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.