City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge
Opinion
Order filed August 4, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-21-00086-CV ____________
CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant
V.
CHRISTYN BRECKENRIDGE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-22876
ORDER
The clerk’s record was filed February 24, 2021. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain Exhibit G (a video deposition of City employee Patrick Riley) to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The Harris County District Court Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before August 11, 2022 containing the above listed item. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge (City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.