City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 4, 2022·No. 14-21-00086-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed August 4, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-21-00086-CV ____________

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

CHRISTYN BRECKENRIDGE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-22876

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed February 24, 2021. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain Exhibit G (a video deposition of City employee Patrick Riley) to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

The Harris County District Court Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before August 11, 2022 containing the above listed item. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge (City of Houston v. Christyn Breckenridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.