City of Homestead v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Homestead v. Dade County

425 So. 2d 593, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22037

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1982

DocketNo. 82-667

StatusPublished

This text of 425 So. 2d 593 (City of Homestead v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Homestead v. Dade County, 425 So. 2d 593, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22037 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The City of Homestead filed suit to enforce Dade County’s alleged duty to assume responsibility for the medical care of indigent patients treated in the municipal hospital. In a multi-count complaint, the City sought declaratory, monetary, and injunc-tive relief predicated upon: (a) the deed by which the County acquired Jackson Memorial Hospital in 1948; (b) a 1967 final decree allegedly construing the County’s responsibilities; (c) state statutes; and (d) negligence. The trial court dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. We reverse.

As to the claims for declaratory relief, we observe that the test is not whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration in his favor, but rather, it is whether he is entitled to a declaration of rights. Rosenhouse v. 1950 Spring Term Grand Jury, 56 So.2d 445 (Fla.1952); Mills v. Ball, 344 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In essence, the County argues that the City does not have a sufficient interest to seek a declaration of rights. We disagree. Section 86.021, Florida Statutes (1981) states, in pertinent part:

Any person claiming to be interested or who may be in doubt about his rights under a deed, ... or whose rights, status, or other equitable or legal relations are affected by a statute, ... may have determined any question of construction or [594]*594validity arising under such statute, . . . deed, ... and obtain a declaration of rights, status or other equitable or legal relations thereunder.

We find that the City has standing to seek declaratory relief. It has alleged a sufficient interest in and doubts about its rights under the deed, the final decree, and the statutory authority to withstand a motion to dismiss those counts of the complaint seeking declaratory relief. See May v. Holley, 59 So.2d 636 (Fla.1952).

Failure to state a cause of action is the second basis upon which the County urges that dismissal was properly granted. Because it is not apparent that the pleading cannot be amended to state a cause of action, we find that the plaintiff must be allowed at least one opportunity to amend.¹

Based on' the foregoing, we reverse and remand to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The City of Homestead filed suit to enforce Dade County’s alleged duty to assume responsibility for the medical care of indigent patients treated in the municipal hospital. In a multi-count complaint, the City sought declaratory, monetary, and injunc-tive relief predicated upon: (a) the deed by which the County acquired Jackson Memorial Hospital in 1948; (b) a 1967 final decree allegedly construing the County’s responsibilities; (c) state statutes; and (d) negligence. The trial court dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. We reverse.

As to the claims for declaratory relief, we observe that the test is not whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration in his favor, but rather, it is whether he is entitled to a declaration of rights. Rosenhouse v. 1950 Spring Term Grand Jury, 56 So.2d 445 (Fla.1952); Mills v. Ball, 344 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). In essence, the County argues that the City does not have a sufficient interest to seek a declaration of rights. We disagree. Section 86.021, Florida Statutes (1981) states, in pertinent part:

Any person claiming to be interested or who may be in doubt about his rights under a deed, ... or whose rights, status, or other equitable or legal relations are affected by a statute, ... may have determined any question of construction or [594]*594validity arising under such statute, . . . deed, ... and obtain a declaration of rights, status or other equitable or legal relations thereunder.

We find that the City has standing to seek declaratory relief. It has alleged a sufficient interest in and doubts about its rights under the deed, the final decree, and the statutory authority to withstand a motion to dismiss those counts of the complaint seeking declaratory relief. See May v. Holley, 59 So.2d 636 (Fla.1952).

Failure to state a cause of action is the second basis upon which the County urges that dismissal was properly granted. Because it is not apparent that the pleading cannot be amended to state a cause of action, we find that the plaintiff must be allowed at least one opportunity to amend.¹

Based on' the foregoing, we reverse and remand to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

425 So. 2d 593, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-homestead-v-dade-county-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack