City of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. Scholler

Indiana Supreme Court

City of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. Scholler

154 N.E. 387, 198 Ind. 729

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 16, 1926·No. Nos. 24,688, 24,689, 24,690.·Published

Opinion

Ewbank, J.

These were actions of mandamus against the city of Hobart and its mayor and members of the common council to compel action upon petitions filed by the several groups of relators for the disannexation from the city of certain lands which relators were alleged to own. The questions involved are fully passed upon and decided in City of Hobart v. State, ex rel. (1926), ante 574, and, on the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in each of these actions is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ewbank, J.

These were actions of mandamus against the city of Hobart and its mayor and members of the common council to compel action upon petitions filed by the several groups of relators for the disannexation from the city of certain lands which relators were alleged to own. The questions involved are fully passed upon and decided in City of Hobart v. State, ex rel. (1926), ante 574, and, on the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in each of these actions is affirmed.

City of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. Scholler, 154 N.E. 387, 198 Ind. 729 (Ind. 1926).

Pincite

154 N.E. 387 (City of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. Scholler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.