City of Hidalgo, Texas v. Hugo Gonzalez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maria Cristina Gonzalez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 31, 2002
Docket13-02-00539-CV
StatusPublished

This text of City of Hidalgo, Texas v. Hugo Gonzalez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maria Cristina Gonzalez (City of Hidalgo, Texas v. Hugo Gonzalez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maria Cristina Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Hidalgo, Texas v. Hugo Gonzalez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maria Cristina Gonzalez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-539-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

CITY OF HIDALGO,                                                               Appellant,

                                                   v.

HUGO GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF

MARIA CRISTINA GONZALEZ, DECEASED,                               Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 92nd  District Court

                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

               Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Hinojosa

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, CITY OF HIDALGO, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-883-01-A.  After the clerk=s record was filed, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 31st day of October, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Hidalgo, Texas v. Hugo Gonzalez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-hidalgo-texas-v-hugo-gonzalez-individually-texapp-2002.