City of Hialeah v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Hialeah v. Hunt

182 So. 2d 405

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1965

DocketNos. 34279, 34278

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 So. 2d 405 (City of Hialeah v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Hialeah v. Hunt, 182 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petitions for writs of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL, and ERVIN, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petitions for writs of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL, and ERVIN, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 2d 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-hialeah-v-hunt-fla-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack