City of Hartshorne v. State ex rel. Wilson

249 P.2d 422, 207 Okla. 304
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 21, 1952
DocketNo. 34359
StatusPublished

This text of 249 P.2d 422 (City of Hartshorne v. State ex rel. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Hartshorne v. State ex rel. Wilson, 249 P.2d 422, 207 Okla. 304 (Okla. 1952).

Opinion

HALLEY, V.C.J.

This State of Oklahoma on relation of Ray G. Wilson brought this action for escheat against the city of Hartshorne, Oklahoma, and joined J. E. Layden as trustee. A judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed.

On February 3, 1950, the brief of plaintiffs in error was filed and the authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error presented in the petition in error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as held by this court in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with .directions.

The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to set aside the judgment for plaintiff and enter judgment dismissing the action.

WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gooldy v. Hines
1940 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 P.2d 422, 207 Okla. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-hartshorne-v-state-ex-rel-wilson-okla-1952.