City of Hartford v. Tucker

Connecticut Appellate Court

City of Hartford v. Tucker

501 A.2d 398, 5 Conn. App. 633, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1212

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 24, 1985·No. 3285·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints¹ against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant’s failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.

We carefully reviewed the named defendant’s claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints¹ against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant’s failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.

We carefully reviewed the named defendant’s claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).

There is no error.

City of Hartford v. Tucker, 501 A.2d 398, 5 Conn. App. 633, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1212 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

501 A.2d 398 (City of Hartford v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related