City of Hartford v. Tucker

Connecticut Appellate Court

City of Hartford v. Tucker

501 A.2d 398, 5 Conn. App. 633, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1212

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 24, 1985

Docket3285

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 501 A.2d 398 (City of Hartford v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Hartford v. Tucker, 501 A.2d 398, 5 Conn. App. 633, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1212 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints¹ against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant’s failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.

We carefully reviewed the named defendant’s claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints¹ against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant’s failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.

We carefully reviewed the named defendant’s claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 A.2d 398, 5 Conn. App. 633, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-hartford-v-tucker-connappct-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack