City of Hallandale v. Leisure Colony Management Corp.
358 So. 2d 27, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4785
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Hallandale v. Leisure Colony Management Corp., 358 So. 2d 27, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4785 (Fla. 1978).
358 So. 2d 27 (City of Hallandale v. Leisure Colony Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paradise Pools v. Genauer
104 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard County
246 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
City of Miami Beach v. 100 Lincoln Road, Inc.
214 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
School District v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
207 A.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Camp v. Moseley
2 Fla. 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1848)
Coogler v. Rogers
25 Fla. 853 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1889)
Pelle v. Gluckman
269 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)