City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.

447 So. 2d 454, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12439

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 28, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 447 So. 2d 454 (City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp., 447 So. 2d 454, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM. •

Our review of the record satisfies us that the actions of the appellant caused appel-lees to prepare additional sheets and supplements to their plans in an effort to meet appellant’s objections. Such actions amounted to a change in circumstances which necessitated the trial court’s action in entering its interim order which extended the time for compliance with the final judgment granting an injunction. We find that the trial judge acted properly and within his discretion. See, Jackson Grain Co. et al. v. Lee, 150 Fla. 232, 7 So.2d 143 (1942).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. •

Our review of the record satisfies us that the actions of the appellant caused appel-lees to prepare additional sheets and supplements to their plans in an effort to meet appellant’s objections. Such actions amounted to a change in circumstances which necessitated the trial court’s action in entering its interim order which extended the time for compliance with the final judgment granting an injunction. We find that the trial judge acted properly and within his discretion. See, Jackson Grain Co. et al. v. Lee, 150 Fla. 232, 7 So.2d 143 (1942).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 So. 2d 454, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-hallandale-v-acmar-engineering-corp-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack