City of Grafton v. Division of Corrections

19 Ct. Cl. 68
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 24, 1992
DocketCC-91-330
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ct. Cl. 68 (City of Grafton v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Grafton v. Division of Corrections, 19 Ct. Cl. 68 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant brought this action to recover late charges in the amount of $1,073.60 when the respondent State agency’s facility, Pruntytown Facility, failed to pay water service fees and fire service fees within a twenty-fay period. The Public Service Commission has provided a late charge penalty in the tariff for claimant.

Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ct. Cl. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-grafton-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1992.