City of Garland, Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2006·No. 03-06-00571-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN





NO. 03-06-00571-CV




City of Garland, Appellant


v.


Public Utility Commission of Texas, Appellee





DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS



O R D E R

                        We have reviewed the record supplied in the motions for emergency stay filed in this direct appeal and applied the relevant standards of review. See Tex. Util. Code Ann. § 15.004 (West 1998); see also Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002); El Paso Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm’n, 727 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, no writ).

                        The Motion for Emergency Stay filed by appellant City of Garland is granted. The implementation of the disclosure provisions of 16 Texas Administrative Code § 25.505(f)(3) are stayed pending further order of this Court. The Public Utility Commission’s conditional Motion for Stay is denied.

                        The City of Garland is ordered to provide copies of City of Garland Resolutions Nos. 8383 and 9160 to this Court on or before October 6, 2006.

                        So ordered September 29, 2006.

                                                                        G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Waldrop

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Garland, Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

City of Garland, Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (City of Garland, Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.
84 S.W.3d 198 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)
El Paso Electric Co. v. Public Utility Commission
727 S.W.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)