City of Gallup v. Hart

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38609

CITY OF GALLUP, New Mexico, a municipal corporation,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP HART,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY Robert A. Aragon, District Judge

Stelzner, Winter, Warburton, Flores & Dawes, P.A. Juan L. Flores Jaime L. Dawes Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

Johanna C. Cox Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals from the district court’s final judgment granting Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment on Defendant’s counterclaims for harassment, retaliation, and defamation. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to affirm. Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of our notice. Defendant, however, has not filed a response to our notice, and the time for doing so has expired. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our notice, we affirm.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge