City of Gainesville v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Gainesville v. Bishop

181 So. 2d 163

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 1965

DocketNo. 34335

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 181 So. 2d 163 (City of Gainesville v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Gainesville v. Bishop, 181 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District. City of Gainesville et al. v. Bishop et al., 174 So.2d 100.

Our initial consideration of the matter suggested a prima facie jurisdictional conflict between the decision under review and prior decisions of this Court on the same point of law. We have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits. On further careful consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. We, therefore, find that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion. ERVIN, J., dissents and agrees with ROBERTS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI