City of Gainesville v. Bishop

181 So. 2d 163
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 15, 1965·No. No. 34335·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District. City of Gainesville et al. v. Bishop et al., 174 So.2d 100.

Our initial consideration of the matter suggested a prima facie jurisdictional conflict between the decision under review and prior decisions of this Court on the same point of law. We have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits. On further careful consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. We, therefore, find that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion. ERVIN, J., dissents and agrees with ROBERTS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Gainesville v. Bishop, 181 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1965).

181 So. 2d 163 (City of Gainesville v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Equity Resources, Inc. v. County of Leon
643 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Willumsen v. Horton
307 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Hough v. Amato
212 So. 2d 662 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)