City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF FRESNO, Case No. 1:18-cv-00504-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY CIVIL PROCEDURE INSURANCE COMPANY, (ECF No. 27) Defendant. On December 27, 2019, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _ January 2, 2020 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company (City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.