City of Fresno v. Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | CITY OF FRESNO, Case No. 1:18-cv-00504-LJO-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT 11 v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF 12 | TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY CIVIL PROCEDURE INSURANCE COMPANY, 13 (ECF No. 27) Defendant. 14 15 16 On December 27, 2019, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 | has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 | 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or 29 | attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. | Dated: _ January 2, 2020 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28