City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

270 U.S. 627, 46 S. Ct. 206
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 25, 1926
DocketNo. 151
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 270 U.S. 627 (City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 270 U.S. 627, 46 S. Ct. 206 (1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165, 175; Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston, 258 U. S. 388, 395; State of Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 262 U. S. 276, 287; Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Georgia, 262 U. S. 625, 631; Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 263 U. S. 679, 690.

Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. West
280 U.S. 234 (Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 U.S. 627, 46 S. Ct. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-fort-smith-v-southwestern-bell-telephone-co-scotus-1926.