City of Fort Smith v. Hackler

216 S.W.2d 603, 216 S.W.3d 603, 364 Ark. 114
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
Docket04-1278
StatusPublished

This text of 216 S.W.2d 603 (City of Fort Smith v. Hackler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Fort Smith v. Hackler, 216 S.W.2d 603, 216 S.W.3d 603, 364 Ark. 114 (Ark. 2005).

Opinions

Jim Hannah, Chief Justice.

The City of Fort Smith appeals the Crawford County Circuit Court’s award of attorney’s fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 18-15-605(b) (Repl. 2003) to landowners Lee and Patricia Hackler in an eminent-domain action. This is a companion case to City of Fort Smith v. Carter, 364 Ark. 100, 216 S.W.3d 594 (2005), which is also handed down today. In the Carter case, the circuit court denied the landowners’ request for attorney’s fees pursuant to § 18-15-605(b). The landowners cross-appealed, and we reversed and remanded, ordering the circuit court to determine the amount of attorney’s fees due the landowners pursuant to § 18-15-605(b).

The arguments offered by the City in the instant case are the same arguments we rejected in the Carter case. Accordingly, we deem it unnecessary to reiterate in the instant case what has been stated in the companion case bearing upon these arguments. Based upon our reasoning set forth in City of Fort Smith v. Carter, we hold that the circuit court did not err in awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 18-15-605 (b).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Fort Smith v. Carter
216 S.W.3d 594 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 S.W.2d 603, 216 S.W.3d 603, 364 Ark. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-fort-smith-v-hackler-ark-2005.