City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith

91 So. 2d 175
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 So. 2d 175 (City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith, 91 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said' motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
91 So. 2d 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 So. 2d 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-fort-lauderdale-v-state-ex-rel-smith-fla-1956.