City of Fort Lauderdale v. Cavender

102 So. 2d 407, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1958·No. No. 212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this court. From our study of the briefs of counsel and perusal of the record, we reached the conclusion that the jury verdict was arrived at in this case upon consideration of conflicting evidence and should not be disturbed.

The record holds evidence sufficient, if believed by the jury, for them to find negligence on the part of the defendant and to conclude that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence. We do not believe any useful purpose would be served by restating the evidence or any law in this opinion. We conclude that the lower court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Cavender, 102 So. 2d 407, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2824 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

102 So. 2d 407 (City of Fort Lauderdale v. Cavender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asbey v. State
102 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)