City of Florence v. Fields

183 S.E. 770, 179 S.C. 169, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 63
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 12, 1936·No. 14228·Published

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The dissenting or minority opinion in this case sets forth the facts, and issues.

In view of the majority opinion in Southern Liquor Distributors et al. v. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, et al. (S. C.), 183 S. E., 765, this day filed, it follows that the petition of the said Edward Fields must be granted.

And it is so adjudged.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Fisi-iburne concur. Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer and Mr. Justice Bonham dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Florence v. Fields, 183 S.E. 770, 179 S.C. 169, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 63 (S.C. 1936).

183 S.E. 770 (City of Florence v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Daniel
183 S.E. 765 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)