City of Florence v. Fields

Supreme Court of South Carolina

City of Florence v. Fields

183 S.E. 770, 179 S.C. 169, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 63

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 12, 1936

Docket14228

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 770 (City of Florence v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Florence v. Fields, 183 S.E. 770, 179 S.C. 169, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 63 (S.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The dissenting or minority opinion in this case sets forth the facts, and issues.

In view of the majority opinion in Southern Liquor Distributors et al. v. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, et al. (S. C.), 183 S. E., 765, this day filed, it follows that the petition of the said Edward Fields must be granted.

And it is so adjudged.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Fisi-iburne concur. Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer and Mr. Justice Bonham dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI