City of Fargo v. Nelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

City of Fargo v. Nelson

919 N.W.2d 339

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 6, 2018

DocketNo. 20170424

StatusPublished

This text of 919 N.W.2d 339 (City of Fargo v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Fargo v. Nelson, 919 N.W.2d 339 (N.D. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*340[¶ 1] Richard Kaye Nelson appeals from a civil judgment finding his property constitutes a public nuisance, requiring abatement of the nuisance, and granting a permanent injunction from maintaining a nuisance on the property. Nelson argues the district court abused its discretion in granting a permanent injunction against him and his property.

[¶ 2] We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction and its findings were not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). State v. Noack , 2007 ND 82, ¶¶ 8, 10, 732 N.W.2d 389 (stating that the Court "will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed," because without adequate briefing and citation to authority, we are unable to meaningfully review alleged errors).

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI