City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

997 A.2d 1150, 606 Pa. 291
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 7, 2010·No. 244 WAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Must a public employer bargain over elimination of a pension benefit that was not found to be illegal by a court of law?

The parties are further directed to address issues regarding the proper manner of interpreting a collective bargaining *292 agreement; specifically, whether the decision of the Commonwealth Court comports with or diverges from principles of contract interpretation and the collective bargaining process guaranteed by Act 111.

Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File a Post-Submission Communication, filed June 10, 2009, is hereby GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 997 A.2d 1150, 606 Pa. 291 (Pa. 2010).

997 A.2d 1150 (City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
32 A.3d 625 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)