City of Enid v. McCann

1917 OK 484, 171 P. 452, 67 Okla. 68, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 339
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 9, 1917·No. 9382·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OWEN, J.

Defendant in error moves to dismiss the appeal in this case for the rea *69 son that an order was entered in the lower court extending the time for the service of case-made until July 1, 1917, and providing that plaintiff be given ten days after service of case-made for suggesting amendments, same to be settled on five days’ notice. The case-made was actually served on June-18, 1917, and signed and settled on notice on July 6, 1917. It is urged by plaintiff in error that the time in which to suggest amendments began to run from the date of service, June 18th, and not from July 1st, the expiration off the time in which to serve the case-made. This case is ruled by the cases of Sov. Camp of W. O. W. v. Chumley, 58 Okla. 681, 161 Pac. 1175, and Frey v. McCune, 52 Okla. 648, 153 Pac. 109, and the motion must be sustained.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Enid v. McCann, 1917 OK 484, 171 P. 452, 67 Okla. 68, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 339 (Okla. 1917).

1917 OK 484 (City of Enid v. McCann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Surety Co. v. Wolsey
1933 OK 165 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Kolb v. Hightower
1932 OK 82 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Giant Powder Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
7 P.2d 1023 (California Supreme Court, 1932)
Bradfield v. Black
1930 OK 173 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris
1923 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. Attorney
1922 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Sharp v. Sharp
1920 OK 378 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Watson v. Shaffner
1919 OK 345 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)