City of Enid v. McCann
This text of 1917 OK 484 (City of Enid v. McCann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant in error moves to dismiss the appeal in this case for the rea *69 son that an order was entered in the lower court extending the time for the service of case-made until July 1, 1917, and providing that plaintiff be given ten days after service of case-made for suggesting amendments, same to be settled on five days’ notice. The case-made was actually served on June-18, 1917, and signed and settled on notice on July 6, 1917. It is urged by plaintiff in error that the time in which to suggest amendments began to run from the date of service, June 18th, and not from July 1st, the expiration off the time in which to serve the case-made. This case is ruled by the cases of Sov. Camp of W. O. W. v. Chumley, 58 Okla. 681, 161 Pac. 1175, and Frey v. McCune, 52 Okla. 648, 153 Pac. 109, and the motion must be sustained.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1917 OK 484, 171 P. 452, 67 Okla. 68, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-enid-v-mccann-okla-1917.