City of Elkins v. Offhaus
This text of 81 S.E. 1132 (City of Elkins v. Offhaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case of Elkins v. Donohoe and this one present similar questions and facts. The deed here describes the land conveyed as triangle 2 in block 41 on the Davis plat, bounded by 156 feet along the turnpike and by a street and an alley running therefrom. To locate the corners, the surveyor began at the same starting point as in the Donohoe case. His measurements between the corners located by him correspond with those in the deed. Part of defendant’s building projects beyond the boundary line, and is to that extent upon the public street. As both cases are governed by the same principles, we deem it unnecessary to say more.
The decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 S.E. 1132, 74 W. Va. 339, 1914 W. Va. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-elkins-v-offhaus-wva-1914.