City of Elizabeth v. Aydlett

156 S.E. 163, 200 N.C. 58, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 26
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 19, 1930·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Section 8 of chapter 250, Public Laws 1923, provides that in case any building or structure is erected or maintained in violation of any ordinance or regulation adopted in pursuance thereof, the proper authorities of the municipality, in addition to other remedies, may institute any appropriate action or iiroceeding to restrain or abate *59 sucb unlawful erection, maintenance, occupancy or use, and to prevent any illegal act in connection therewith.

This differentiates the case from Elizabeth City v. Aydlett, 198 N. C., 585, 152 S. E., 681, and the trial court was in error in holding that plaintiff was precluded from testing the matter by injunction. 14 E. O. L., 379.

The validity of the ordinance is not involved on the present appeal. The appropriateness of the remedy selected by plaintiff is the only question presented for decision.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Elizabeth v. Aydlett, 156 S.E. 163, 200 N.C. 58, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 26 (N.C. 1930).

156 S.E. 163 (City of Elizabeth v. Aydlett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Lane
102 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Rose v. City of Andalusia
31 So. 2d 66 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Town of Montclair v. Kip
160 A. 677 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
City of Elizabeth v. Aydlett
161 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)