City of Elberton v. Auld

104 S.E. 640, 150 Ga. 666, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1920·No. Nor. 1914, 1915, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

These were suits for injunction hy the owners of property to enjoin a municipality from constructing a sewer line and from emptying- sewage into a non-navigable stream which flowed through the land of petitioners. The evidence for the plaintiffs tended to show that the discharge of sewage into the stream would pollute the stream, destroy the value of plaintiffs’ lands for pasturage and other purposes; and that the nuisance would be continuing and permanent, and the damages irreparable. On the question of laches the court did not abuse his discretion in granting the interlocutory injunction. Mayor &c. of Waycross v. Houk, 113 Ga. 963 (39 S. E. 577).

Judgment affirmed..

All ¡he Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Elberton v. Auld, 104 S.E. 640, 150 Ga. 666, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 280 (Ga. 1920).

104 S.E. 640 (City of Elberton v. Auld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Segars v. City of Cornelia
193 S.E. 794 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)