City of El Paso v. Rhonda E. Luebs

Court of Appeals of Texas

City of El Paso v. Rhonda E. Luebs

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 25, 2019·No. 08-19-00200-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

CITY OF EL PASO, § No. 08-19-00200-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 384thDistrict Court RHONDA E. LUEBS, § of El Paso County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 2018DCV2030)

§

ORDER

We have this day filed the City of El Paso's objection to the Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to file an Appellee Brief. We note that despite the Appellee's certificate of conference stating that the parties had conferred about the motion and that the City was unopposed to the time extension, the City asserts counsel for the Appellee never, in fact, consulted with the City prior to filing the motion for extension of time. The City states that this was presumably a clerical error in the motion. Nevertheless, counsel as officers of the Court are admonished to be accurate in their sworn attestations in filings before this Court.

We have carefully considered the City's objection. The objection is overruled. The Appellee Brief remains due on October 4, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

CITY OF EL PASO, § No. 08-19-00200-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 384thDistrict Court RHONDA E. LUEBS, § of El Paso County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 2018DCV2030)

§

ORDER

We have this day filed the City of El Paso's objection to the Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to file an Appellee Brief. We note that despite the Appellee's certificate of conference stating that the parties had conferred about the motion and that the City was unopposed to the time extension, the City asserts counsel for the Appellee never, in fact, consulted with the City prior to filing the motion for extension of time. The City states that this was presumably a clerical error in the motion. Nevertheless, counsel as officers of the Court are admonished to be accurate in their sworn attestations in filings before this Court.

We have carefully considered the City's objection. The objection is overruled. The Appellee Brief remains due on October 4, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2019.

PER CURIAM

City of El Paso v. Rhonda E. Luebs, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

City of El Paso v. Rhonda E. Luebs (City of El Paso v. Rhonda E. Luebs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.