City of East St. Louis v. Mahoney

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of East St. Louis v. Mahoney

77 Ill. App. 574, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 96

DecidedAugust 31, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 77 Ill. App. 574 (City of East St. Louis v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of East St. Louis v. Mahoney, 77 Ill. App. 574, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 96 (Ill. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Worthington

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action by appellee for damages sustained on account of defective sidewalk.

Declaration in usual form, and plea of not guilty. Verdict and judgment for appellee for $500. .

The only questions presented in the brief and argument of appellant are questions of fact. They have been fairly presented to the jury and there is evidence to sustain the verdict. The law is so well settled that in such cases the verdict must stand, that citation of authorities is not necessary. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Worthington

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action by appellee for damages sustained on account of defective sidewalk.

Declaration in usual form, and plea of not guilty. Verdict and judgment for appellee for $500. .

The only questions presented in the brief and argument of appellant are questions of fact. They have been fairly presented to the jury and there is evidence to sustain the verdict. The law is so well settled that in such cases the verdict must stand, that citation of authorities is not necessary. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 Ill. App. 574, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-east-st-louis-v-mahoney-illappct-1898.