City of East Lansing v. Kipling Cornell Wilson
This text of City of East Lansing v. Kipling Cornell Wilson (City of East Lansing v. Kipling Cornell Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160344 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra CITY OF EAST LANSING, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160344 COA: 348391 Ingham CC: 18-000410-AV KIPLING CORNELL WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 30, 2020 a0622 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of East Lansing v. Kipling Cornell Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-east-lansing-v-kipling-cornell-wilson-mich-2020.