City of Durham v. Keen
257 S.E.2d 217, 297 N.C. 608, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1490
This text of 257 S.E.2d 217 (City of Durham v. Keen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Durham v. Keen, 257 S.E.2d 217, 297 N.C. 608, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1490 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
CITY OF DURHAM
v.
Marjorie S. KEEN and spouse, the County of Durham, Original Defendants,
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
E. C. Harris, Jr., Blackwell M. Brogden, Jr., for defendant Keen.
Rufus C. Boutwell, Jr., for plaintiff City of Durham.
T. Russell Odom, for defendant County of Durham.
C. Horton Poe, Jr., for defendants Knotts.
Defendant's Keen notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 40 N.C.App. 652, 253 S.E.2d 585. Petition denied. Motion of the defendants Knotts to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Durham v. Keen
253 S.E.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
257 S.E.2d 217, 297 N.C. 608, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-durham-v-keen-nc-1979.