City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders Ass'n

330 So. 2d 744, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15060
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1976·No. Nos. 74-401, 74-1017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

■ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April 30, 1975 (312 So.2d 763) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County in the above-styled case, and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed February 25, 1976 (329 So.2d 314) and its mandate now lodged in this court, remanded to this court with directions to dispose of the question of costs and to thereafter re[745]*745mand for further proceedings in the trial court, and

Whereas, this court is now of the opinion that the judgment for costs was properly entered.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the interlocutory appeal on the question of costs is hereby affirmed, and the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on June 10, 1975, is withdrawn. The judgment of this court filed in this cause on April 30, 1975, is vacated, and the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The cause is hereby remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders Ass'n, 330 So. 2d 744, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15060 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

330 So. 2d 744 (City of Dunedin v. Contractors & Builders Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tarpon Springs v. TARPON SPRINGS ARC. LTD.
585 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)