City of Dubuque v. Jade Engineering, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa

Court of Appeals of Iowa

City of Dubuque v. Jade Engineering, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa

918 N.W.2d 502

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa

DecidedApril 18, 2018

Docket17-0056

StatusPublished

This text of 918 N.W.2d 502 (City of Dubuque v. Jade Engineering, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Dubuque v. Jade Engineering, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa, 918 N.W.2d 502 (iowactapp 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

MCDONALD, Judge.

The City of Dubuque pursues this appeal from an order denying its petition to obtain title to four pieces of real property claimed to be abandoned within the meaning of Iowa Code section 657A.10A (2016). On appeal, the city challenges the district court's findings of fact, application of fact to law, and ultimate conclusion the city failed to prove the parcels were abandoned within the meaning of the case. Our review is de novo. See Iowa Code § 657A.10A(1) ; Iowa R. App. P. 6.907 ( ); City of Council Bluffs v. Harder , No. 08-1315, 2009 WL 3775116 , at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009). We are not bound by the district court's factual findings, but we give them weight, especially when considering the credibility of witnesses. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g). On de novo review, balancing all of the relevant statutory factors, like the district court, we conclude the city failed to prove the property was abandoned within the meaning of the Code. We affirm the judgment of the district court without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26 (a), (d).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCDONALD, Judge.

The City of Dubuque pursues this appeal from an order denying its petition to obtain title to four pieces of real property claimed to be abandoned within the meaning of Iowa Code section 657A.10A (2016). On appeal, the city challenges the district court's findings of fact, application of fact to law, and ultimate conclusion the city failed to prove the parcels were abandoned within the meaning of the case. Our review is de novo. See Iowa Code § 657A.10A(1) ; Iowa R. App. P. 6.907 ( ); City of Council Bluffs v. Harder , No. 08-1315, 2009 WL 3775116 , at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009). We are not bound by the district court's factual findings, but we give them weight, especially when considering the credibility of witnesses. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g). On de novo review, balancing all of the relevant statutory factors, like the district court, we conclude the city failed to prove the property was abandoned within the meaning of the Code. We affirm the judgment of the district court without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26 (a), (d).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 N.W.2d 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-dubuque-v-jade-engineering-llc-and-dubuque-county-iowa-iowactapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack